Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Geens vs Niels Desein Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Geens vs Desein analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Geens vs Niels Desein Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Geens 1 - 0 Desein
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geens has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Desein has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geens, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Desein has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Desein has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Desein winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 49/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Desein has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 131/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Geens winning 1 times and Desein being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Geens winning 2 and Desein winning 0. The last match between Geens and Desein was at the France F23, 19-10-2015, First, I.hard with Clement Geens getting the victory 7-6(5) 4-2 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Geens and Desein have played a deciding set 0 times, with Geens winning 0 times and Desein 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Geens winning 1, and Desein 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Desein has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Desein has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Desein has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
245
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
154
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
61% (228-144)
Career Total W/L
60% (515-347)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$81,829
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Clement Geens vs Niels Desein For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Geens VS Desein
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Clement Geens | Niels Desein |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 11 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) | 70% (42/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (34/43) | 71% (30/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 58% (11/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (20/61) | 33% (21/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 4-2 ret. |
Stats 
Clement Geens
Player
Niels Desein
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Geens | Niels Desein |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clement Geens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Clement Geens
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Benjamin Hassan
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Lenny Hampel
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexis Musialek
Player
Clement Geens
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
7 of
16)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
45%
(
5 of
11)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
20
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Zizou Bergs
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Eleftherios Theodorou
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Desein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Niels Desein
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Hugo Voljacques
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Niels Desein
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Pedro Gabriel Rodrigues
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Geens Vs Desein Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Geens are available here and Desein photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
